Monday, January 28, 2019

Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Essay

The process of evaluating historical aspects of leading involved critically analyzing the commonalities and disparities among a free radical of influential attractions, such as Thomas Carlyle, Mohandas Gandhi, Niccolo Machiavelli and W.E.B Du Bois. Carlyle (1795-1881), a Scottish historiographer emphasized the importance of heroism that required custody to be subordinated to the commanding officer of men (Wren, 1995 p.53). Further analysis of the evaluation revealed theories of Gandhi and Machiavelli which produced evidence of conflicting viewpoints on the topic of violence among historical attractions byout the ages. Gandhis leadinghip style was against any acts of violence. He centre on using spiritual guidance to solve problems. Machiavellis leadershiphiphip style believed in having grace but also defending yourself if necessary. W.E.B Du Boiss leadership style focused on educating black men to be great leaders.Each leaders theories on the quality of satisfying leade rship were unlike, yet accept able in their communities, however, each(prenominal) leader presented various methods of effective leadership abilities, which result influence other leaders as they develop their theories.Commonalities and DisparitiesThomas Carlyle, believed that the commandant of men was superior, and all men were to be subordinated. Carlyle focused on the opening that leaders who exhibited themselves in a dignified manner bodily the qualities of a great leader (Carlyle, 1795-1881 Wren, 1995, p.53). Carlyle also emphasized that heroism existed in whoever embodied the spiritual qualities of a commander. Further examination of Carlyles leadership surmise revealed that he believed that a leader who is a nobleman give notice be trusted by all people (Carlyle, 1795-1881 Wren, 1995, p.53). Niccolo Machiavellis theory of a leader was described as someone who can lead men whether they abided by or disobey the law.Machiavelli also believed that leaders who can ins titute authority can be merciful, humane, but cautious. Mohandas Gandhi theory believed leaders should command using self- control and discipline. Gandhi also described a powerful leader as someone who uses passive resistance (Gandhi, 1869-1984 Machiavelli, 1469-1527 Wren, 1995, p.68 &75). Finally W.E.B Du Bois was an pleader for educating black men, and he placed great emphasize on how gentility involved the training of ones mind, body and surroundings (Du Bois, 1868-1963 Wren, 1995, p.78). Du Bois theory on learning is that people can be influenced by their surrounds and motivate by different groups of people.Critical AnalysisAfter completing the commonalities and disparities involving trinity great leaders my critical evaluation has led me to the conclusion that charge though these leaders embody the characteristic to be excellent facilitators and commanders, each leader lacks the ability to use effective communicating skills. Previous look for has suggested that the lac k of confabulation can be confusing, misunderstanding and lethal. For example, Emperor Frederick thirteenth century ruler of the Holy Roman Empire conducted research to dress what language mankind had spoken at birth. The experiment involved isolate infants from hearing any communication until they spoke their first words. However, as a result of the experiment the babies died (Samata, 2012).Further studies have concluded that leaders who pass communication skills can establish their existence and define their image, but leaders who fail to communicate effectively and positively, risk damaging their reputation (Samata, 2012). stiff leadership requires leaders to be competent communicators, which is achieved by using lapse and concise communication (Adubato, 2010). Furthermore, leaders who can use communication skills effectively, ar able to comprehend and express ideas (Ringer, 2002 Tareq, 2008).Achieving effective oral communication skills requires leaders to limit words and phrases, which results in explaining their concepts and ideas. Levinson also states, leaders who use in addition many words have a tendency to ramble more or less non-relevant issues, however summarizing the main points, staying focused and avoiding distractions helps leaders discipline what information is relevant, resulting in translating their thoughts into a profitable action faster (1968). stiff communication requires leaders to be prepared, organized and observant, giving leaders the ability to execute their pass on successfully (Showry & Manasa, 2012).Conclusion.By evaluating the leadership styles of historical leaders, I was able to understand how their theories influenced people throughout the ages. Carlyle, Gandhi, Machiavelli, and DuBois were all very influential leaders during their times in history. However, after comparing their similarities and disparities in theory and style, it is unembellished that Carlyle viewpoints on what a great leader should be is entirely different from the perspectives of Gandhi, Machiavelli, and DuBois. Carlyle emphasized that all men should being entirely subordinate to their commander, and Gandhi believed in spirituality and taught leaders to focus on positive concepts.Machiavelli used a more drastic approach that required him to be prudent, be observant and maintain authority. Du Bois believed that black men should be educated. Further observation revealed that, regular(a) though, each leader embodied leadership qualities, using effective communication skills are essential to providing leaders with better communication technique, making the centre clear and concise. Leaders have the ability to achieve effective communication skills by limiting their words and stating the main facts. Finally leaders who can improve communication skills, can empower people, and maintain stability.ReferenceAdubato, S. (2010). communicating is key to effective office team building. NJBIZ, 23(27), 9. Retrieved from http//s earch.proquest.com/docview/644992473?accountid=35812 Levinson, R. E. (1968). How to get through to people. industrial Management, 10(5), 11.Ringer, R. (2002, Jul 28). Communication skills valued by employers. Pantagraph Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/252480712?accountid=35812 Tareq, N. A. (2008, Mar 06). Affective communication skills. Yemen time Retrieved fromhttp//search.proquest.com/docview/429795478?accountid=35812 Samata, P. (2012). Importance of Effective Communication Skills. Language In India, 12(10), 333-341. Showry, M., & Manasa, K. (2012). Effective Communication for Professional Excellence. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 6(1), 39-46.Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders companion Insight on leadership through the ages. Carlyle, T. The Hero as mightiness (pp.53-54) New York, NY The discharge Press.Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders Companion Insight on leadership through the ages. Du Bois, W .E.B. The Talented Tenth (pp.78-80) New York, NY The Free Press.Wren , J. T. (1995). The Leaders Companion Insight on leadership through the ages. Gandhi, M. Satyagraha (pp.72-77) New York, NY The Free Press.Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders Companion Insight on leadership through the ages. Machiavelli, N. How Princes Should Keep Faith (pp.67-68) New York, NY The Free Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment